Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeminoleCounty
We require health and safety labeling when there is an identifiable risk. GM crops are tested before they are commercialized. They are as safe as any other food on the shelf. The anti-GM zealots are engaged in high-decibel disinformation in which flagrantly false charges are carelessly slung around, and they want the government to impose health labeling on GM foods to create an imputation of risk in the minds of low-information consumers. That is what the fight is about.

Show that there is a risk, with serious, peer reviewed studies, and USDA/FDA/EPA will require labeling, or prohibit the product entirely. But once a product has been tested and approved for safety, the burden of proof is on the accuser.

This is one of the areas where junk science is epidemic. There is a substantial cottage industry of advocacy groups pumping out "studies" that don't meet elementary scientific standards. But the press jumps on them, and we're off to the races. If we had a way to attach punitive damages to such false accusations, Monsanto would have a whole new profit center.

8 posted on 06/16/2013 6:12:40 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx; SeminoleCounty
controlled pig stomach final-corrA groundbreaking new study [1] shows that pigs were harmed by the consumption of feed containing genetically modified (GM) crops.

http://farmwars.info/?p=10833#more-10833

GM-fed females had on average a 25% heavier uterus than non-GM-fed females, a possible indicator of disease that requires further investigation. Also, the level of severe inflammation in stomachs was markedly higher in pigs fed on the GM diet. The research results were striking and statistically significant. Lead researcher Dr Judy Carman, adjunct associate professor at Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia,[2] said: “Our findings are noteworthy for several reasons. First, we found these results in real on-farm conditions, not in a laboratory, but with the added benefit of strict scientific controls that are not normally present on farms.

“Second, we used pigs. Pigs with these health problems end up in our food supply. We eat them.

“Third, pigs have a similar digestive system to people, so we need to investigate if people are also getting digestive problems from eating GM crops.

snipped

10 posted on 06/16/2013 10:55:47 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson