Posted on 07/18/2013 9:02:51 AM PDT by jrg
Roderick Scott went out of his house to confront a trio of punks breaking into cars in his Greece, New York neighborhood. Scott's story was that he fired 2 rounds at one of them when the young man charged him after being told to freeze and wait for the cops. So, we largely have an inverse image of the incident in which Travon Martin perished, complete with the kinfolk weeping thusly....
(Excerpt) Read more at thetruthaboutguns.com ...
When do the riots start? Is it too late for me to set fire to my car?
There’s no profit for the race pimps in this one ... time to move on.
Not guiltywas the right verdict here .
when you think about it, IF the victim was outside, on the sidewalk, and the shooter shot him from his porch, then this was an innocent killing...
but we'll never know since it doesn't fit the agenda...
Yeah, this was out and out murder, and the guy is happy about how he shot that white cracka’.
How was this “out and out murder”? He said the guy charged at him, and the jury obviously believed that he had a reasonable fear of death/bodily harm.
3 punks breaking into cars are confronted. Two flee and the third runs toward the man confronting them and is shot. After reading a couple of articles on the trial I have found nothing to contradict Scott's sequence of events. Seems to me this was justifiable and whether or not Scott is happy about shooting a white kid is irrelevant.
I will LOVE to see how the guy who got killed will be portrayed by the Commie Media.
I wonder if they will show him as a happy-go-lucky teen and show him at 10 years old?
I wonder if they will cover up the facts of him being wasted on Robitussin, his criminal record, his school record or the fact he was carrying buglary tools.
No, he will be an evil a-hole, irrespective of what he truly was, a-hole or not.
I guess there is some kind of retribution for our ancestor’s transgressions being foisted upon the American Majority.
Holder, Jesse, Al and Uh-Bama all want the no-tans to pay, and pay big.
Uhh, folks, this shooting took place in 08, the trial in 09.
Well, there’s no homeowners’ association involved, so there’s no money in it for a lawyer. Next case.
I’m just repeating the Trayvon nonsense with sarcasm. The guy is going out to confront the kids because he sees them doing something to his neighbor’s car. That is like being on neighborhood crime watch. He immediately pulls a gun on them, unlike George who took a beating first. He shot a kid who was thinner and smaller than him, a kid he could have beat he crap out of probably, unlike George, who was smaller than Trayvon. He shot twice, unlike George who only shot once.
All that, and I still agree with you. Nevertheless, this stuff needs to be put in the faces of the race-baiters.
The “white teen” part doesn’t matter. It is is the “young hoodlum” that is the issue and got the kid shot.
I should have used a /s, but I didn’t think it was necessary, given the circumstances we are enduring because of the Taryvons. I have no problem with the jury’s decision. They heard the evidence. However, if Roderick had been a white man killing a black kid under the same circumstances, he would be an icon of white, racist America, and he would also be in prison. This case would have been much easier to prosecute than Zimmerman’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.