Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

They say here below, with 3 references, that the small moon is known to have “significant porosity” (has internal crevices). I guess that would explain the low over all density.

“Spectroscopically it appears to be similar to the D-type asteroids,[10] and is apparently of composition similar to carbonaceous chondrite material.[11] Phobos’s density is too low to be solid rock, and it is known to have significant porosity.[12][13][14]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_%28moon%29#Physical_characteristics


8 posted on 12/24/2013 9:56:10 PM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ETL

Porosity would suggest a formation (perhaps from a larger former body) with high heat, resulting in expansion of various materials such as water into vapor, leaving voids as the vapor eventually escaped. On Earth we see pumice, which would be analogous, but which has the gases still in the voids. One of the problems with excavating Herculanaeum is that the stone has billions of pores still containing the poisonous gases belched up by the 79 AD eruption.


23 posted on 12/25/2013 6:06:24 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson