"Will you sing the same tune when they apply “legal” evidence to global warming?"The same tune? Yeah, I'll look the scripture first and then see how scientists stack up against that. Here's what I know from scripture....
- Genesis 8:22 While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.” (There might be variations, but this verse pretty much tells me not to worry. That the so-called scientists with their disaster scenarios are full of hot air. And God is in control of climate.)
- Genesis 1:28 - And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. (God has given man dominion over the earth so we should be good stewards of it. It's not wrong to worry and address environmental concerns. But man was meant to subdue the earth.)
- Isaiah 49:10 - They shall not hunger nor thirst; neither shall the heat nor sun smite them: for he that hath mercy on them shall lead them, even by the springs of water shall he guide them. (Again God is ultimately in control of climate. Man has limited impact.)
- Revelation 16:8 The fourth angel poured out his bowl on the sun, and it was allowed to scorch people with fire. (There is going to be a time when the sun scorches people, and they curse God because of the heat, but it appears to originate with God's judgement and with the Sun, not changes in Earth's atmosphere.)
But I think you meant legal vs scientific evidence. Well, the global scientists are trying to apply legal and scientific evidence. But fortunately there is an opposition that is finding many climate scientists don't agree, the scientific data in favor is hand picked and not scientific at all, and the slogan "the debate is over" is propaganda not legal argument.
There's a great article titled 150 years of Climate Change at the Times. It chronicles the swings back and forth between global warming and global cooling (always with an alleged "scientific consensus"). Climate change is great for politics and selling papers. But appears to be mostly junk science.
So both the legal and scientific battles definitely have to be fought.