Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Usagi_yo
It’s okay, but it comes across as written in anger.

Hm, how do you figure that? (What parts?)

Plus when you specifically enumerate, you implicitly exclude anything not on the list, so you should be more generic, like Federal employee, appointee, Elected, Consultant ... etc ...

This is true; the problem is that federal employee seems to be rather whimsically applied when it comes to congressmen — remember John Murtha? He got out of being held liable for slander because judges considered him a federal employee and doing his job so that they could excuse him from calling some marines murderers on public/national TV.

18 posted on 02/28/2014 7:25:12 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

Sorry, it’s just looks like it’s written by somebody with a chip on their shoulder.

To me, at least, it seems like forcing full financial disclosures with clean bill of health from the IRS (audit) at every election cycle would be better than enforcing taxation on them.

We don’t have a right to privacy anymore, why should they?


19 posted on 02/28/2014 8:09:23 AM PST by Usagi_yo (Standardization is an Evolutionary dead end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson