Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff F

Since the tanker would necessarily fly at a much lower speed and lower altitude, I can’t see the advantage of developing the complex technology involved in mid air LOX and liquid hydrogen transfer.


6 posted on 08/19/2014 1:41:07 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants
A fair amount of fuel would need to be burned in a fully loaded craft just to reach 35,000 feet. Even worse, the stubby little wings would not be able to lift a lot of weight at the much lower takeoff speeds. If you could defer adding 100,000 pounds or so of LOX until you are at cruising speed, then you gain a proportional amount of payload capacity. Plus you are already traveling near mach 1, seven miles up, and in much thinner air.

As a comparison, the Space Shuttle burned nearly a fifth of its LH2 and LOX in order to reach 35,000 feet, and that is with the assist of two solid rock boosters.

7 posted on 08/19/2014 2:35:53 PM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson