LBJ’s a piker compared to the Clintons.
The difference is LBJ is dead and the people, including the MSM, that were protecting him are pretty much dead and gone.
Nobody left to protect him.
With the Clintons, both are still alive and the people and MSM that were protecting them are still alive and still protecting them.
With the Clintons, people including yourself, simply refuse to accept the level of corruption that’s possible from someone that has been elected president twice.
I lived through both administrations and I'm well aware of the extraordinary level of corruption within the Clinton administration, thank you.
Notice, though, that I referenced two specific metrics: corruption and abuse of power. LBJ, in my opinion, rates worse than Clinton because of his extraordinary abuse of power. Clinton was no piker in this regard, either. But LBJ was comparable to BHO on this measure.
I'm not convinced, for example, that LBJ had a role in the assassination of JFK -- but he was quite capable of doing so. Again, not to say that Bill (or Hillary) wasn't capable of the same thing.
Oh, hell! Upon reflection, there might not have been that much difference after all. Let's agree that the three administrations stand head and shoulders ahead of any other pretenders.