To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder why that might be?
Nefarious intent aside, if there's no working theory available to explain the results, it's awfully difficult to build a device that can operate safely. There's no framework to predict what might happen. I'd have to think these guys are just plodding around in the dark, tweaking here and there just to see what will happen.
Imagine someone who stumbled onto nuclear fission, maybe by building a radioactive pile and noticing it got warm, but didn't have the theory to predict critical mass, or even suspect that critical mass was a factor. Could easily build a bomb by mistake.
14 posted on
10/08/2014 11:52:44 AM PDT by
chrisser
(When do we get to tell the Middle East to stop clinging to their guns and religion?)
To: chrisser
Sort of like Edison’s approach but with more severe consequences than pungent odors or burnt fingers.
29 posted on
10/08/2014 12:37:25 PM PDT by
dhs12345
To: chrisser
Close...you can’t build a bomb by mistake, but you could potentially irradiate the hell out of everything and everybody. In fact, we really kind of did that during development.
59 posted on
10/09/2014 8:10:19 AM PDT by
fuente
(Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson