Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
The prevailing opinion is that what Hanno saw were bonfires lighted by the natives. It is said that the streams of lava could have been the phosphorescence of leaves (Del Turco).

This reminded me of the tortured logic used by the academics who laughed at the Antikythera mechanism as being from around the first BC: "It was accidentally dropped overboard by a ship during the Middle Ages and just happened to land on the Roman wreck." (or words to that effect.)

That's right up there with those pooh-poohing experienced pilots who described structured aircraft making impossible turns at incredible speeds (UFOs) as "The planet Venus incorrectly observed." (I kid you not.)

The list goes on and on of dogmatic statements by those who refuse to deviate from "what we all know to be true" (because I have written books and based my whole academic career on that belief.)

11 posted on 02/15/2015 11:28:40 AM PST by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka

I wholeheartedly agree. Beech fossils around 2-3 million years old were found on Antarctica — which has supposedly been in deep freeze for 30 million — and some future Nobel laureate claimed they’d been brought from South America (1200 km, minimum) by the winds. Another joker claimed that artifacts from a PreClovis context, found in Canada, were just recent discards, using the words, “any dude could have put that there.”


12 posted on 02/15/2015 11:39:57 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson