Replies

Well, sure, we got the current number of trees wrong by over 600 percent, but we DEFINITELY know the number of trees at the beginning of human civilization!

110 posted on 09/03/2015 3:04:47 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)

And of course the moment that they say "there are fewer trees than at the beginning of HUMANS", the implication is that they know the number of trees that there "should be", and any variation is the fault of humans, who must be controlled and punished for the variations.

Of course, in the evolution of the planet, crops, plants, shrubs, etc all may be nature's intended replacement for trees, but Liberals know better, and will ensure that their plans pre-empt Nature or mankind. Their faith is stronger than either of those enemies.

111 posted on 09/03/2015 3:09:15 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)