Posted on 09/04/2015 8:22:25 AM PDT by Signalman
And please, no walks in the Park.
If he gets even a hair’s worth near looking like he’s gonna spill his guts, he’ll certainly get Arkancided.
Bryan. Hitlary is not going to care when your butt hole is being opened in sing sing.
Mrs. Bill’s email troubles will worsen or ease exactly as the Obama directed Justice Department deems to the best political advantage of Obama.
Ambassador Stevens would like to talk to the Benghazi Committee.
Well the questions to be asked of this guy should be the same ones asked of the Hildabeast in october.
If she pulls the same act she taught her aide Cheryl Mills yesterday in her testimony,where her lawyer said,well she has a bad memory and what we are talking about happened two years ago.
Then Hillary could be disqualified as having alzheimers
He set up the server knowing that he was acting against governmental security guidelines!
At the time, he knew he was breaking the law -- which is amply demonstrated by his pleading the fifth.
If that's your attitude, why do you bother?
Go get a bottle or a joint, sit in the corner and fergettaboutit.
Drag him in and ask him the questions
What proof is there that he knew what Hillary was going to use it for? If she had only sent personal emails using it, then there would be no illegality.
You heard what happened to the guy that setup SilkRoad, right?
He is correct. Nothing will happen to Hillary. Everyone around may crash and burn, but Hillary will be unscathed.
When the Republican representatives asked questions she had memory lapses and said I do not recall. Her memory seemed fine in response to questions from Democrats.
Trained by Hilly house of “ I Don’t Recall” ruling elite .
Ollie North was given immunity, forced to testify, and was then prosecuted and convicted based in part on what prosecutors learned in that testimony. His conviction was thrown out on appeal because of the immunity grant.
I found this pretty good web site on this issue. Lots of tech companies sue each other all the time, in general the issues are not the type that allow one to take the fifth.
Tech Law Biz: Refusing to Testify in Civil Depositions based on the Fifth Amendment
I'm pretty confident if this is a bogus claim Judical Watch will get it smashed.
National Security Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server
Who may assert the privilege?
The Fifth Amendment privilege is purely a personal right. Only natural persons may refuse to testify on that basis; corporations and other organizations may not. Braswell v. United States, 108 S. Ct. 2179, 2182 (1988). While corporate officers, directors, agents and employees may all invoke the privilege, they may do so only on their own behalf and not on behalf of any other person or entity.
When may one assert the privilege?
To assert the Fifth Amendment privilege, a witness must have reasonable cause to apprehend a real danger of incrimination. Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). Incrimination refers to the possibility of criminal prosecution in the United States, but not in foreign jurisdictions. United States v. Balsys, 524 U.S. 666 (1998). For example, depending on the case, testimony in a civil action could lead to reasonable fear of incrimination relating to crimes of fraud, economic espionage, price-fixing, anti-trust or securities violations and even perjury.
One may not make a blanket assertion of the privilege, such as refusing to attend a deposition or asserting the privilege in advance with respect to all potential questions. Instead, one must invoke it on a question-by-question basis and courts will determine the propriety of the assertions on the same basis. North River Insurance Co. v. Stefanou, 831 F.2d 484 (4th Cir. 1987).
...
However, there must be a real possibility of criminal prosecution; the risk cannot be imaginary, remote or speculative. United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980).
I'm not a lawyer.
So, how much of the "immunity" talk over the last several months has been absolute disinformation? Is it time to bypass the jury box?
It stinks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.