Posted on 10/02/2015 6:30:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
LOL! Don't hold back, tell us what you really think about her.
Thanks for the brief 'bio', by the way. I had never heard of her before - but given the socialist nature of the 'Atlantic' magazine, I don't doubt that she's of the same ilk.
These ghouls NEVER go away. Witness Jamie Gorelick, Teresa, and all the rest. They go hide somewhere after their masters go out of office. But they are ALWAYS there ready to feed and destroy.
It is up to us to remember them like they were and are Nazi Concentration Camp guards so they cannot retread their trash.
Bernie Ebbers still rotting in prison.
Studies have shown that people who retire before the age of 60 have DOUBLE the mortality rate of those who retire after 60. And those who retire after 60 (but before 65) have a 27% greater chance of dying before reaching the age of 65!
We, as humans, are meant to be busy and active. When we “retire,” typically,we stop being active and our bodies just start shutting down.
Those who took up hobbies, volunteered, or at least maintained a part-time job were 80 more likely to make it to 65 years of age.
Coincidence?
All of these studies were based on death by the age of 65.
And that 80 in the second to last line should be 80%.
Good thinking, pal!! You keep right on working until you pass over.
Doesn't mean the ants should pay for the grasshoppers. By her premise, we could say, there will always be those who are much more athletically gifted, so let's make them share their salaries with those who aren't. Or those who are gifted in business, or the arts, or fill-in-the-blank. Simply broken down, from each according to his ability to each according to his need. It's just socialistic wealth redistribution hiding behind bad social psychology.
My BIL is the ultimate grasshopper. At 66, we're not sure he's worked enough to be able to draw SS. His philosophy is that spenders are better with money than savers, because spenders can think of a lot of things to do with money (to spend it on), whereas savers just know how to do one thing with money; save it. Needless to say, he and Hubby, who is a saver, don't have the best relationship.
The author has been trying to figure out ways to help them get their hands on it for a good while now. Looks like the current attempt is, "People are too stupid to save, so the government should do it for them. You know, to be helpful."
Periods of unemployment and under employment impair ability to save for retirement. (In other words, it is difficult to save money if you aren’t making much - or any - in the Bush/Obama economies.
I think it is going to happen, it is just a matter of time. Call it an educated hunch.
It was "paid back" with smoke and mirrors.
This is one of the reasons why I think the whole shebang, including IRAs and 401Ks, will be merged into a sham of collectivization when a financial collapse occurs.
Oh, and from today's news:
Government to hit debt limit in November: Lew
" In a letter to lawmakers, Lew said the federal government would likely have less than $30 billion in cash at that point, straining its ability to pay its obligations. "I respectfully urge Congress to take action as soon as possible and raise the debt limit," Lew said. "
Remember, the hundreds of millions of rounds of bullets purchased for almost every Federal agency, thousands of military MRAPs converted to civilian use, and the rest was not accomplished without a purpose.
Do those studies take into account people who retire before 60, or before 65, because they already have serious health problems?
Through Medicare and ObamaCare, and the soon to come budget crisis, they will control who dies and who will receive care. When Gov. Palin spoke out against the "Death Panels" the media and Democrats went berserk. Why was that? She touched on the truth.
Those are the people that "cost too much" and our government will allow for age and disease to take their toll, I believe.
Having said that, there is very little American economy left that is not QE Wall Street infused heroin Central Bank teat suckers, or Federal money for Medicare/Medicaid/ObamaCare.
My wife and I went past an office complex that used to produce printing and art supplies. It is now a "Pharmaceuticals" office that deals exclusively with Medicare/Medicaid/ObamaCare recipients.
The trough for the Federal Trillions is a vast source of revenue. Few people make and produce things in America anymore. We are a nation of 95,000,0000 out of the workforce and 30,000,000 illegal invaders.
Many Freepers will come out with guns blazing about how they "paid into" all Social Security and Medicare, and they are correct.
However, that does not mean they are "above it all" in terms of our government's shenanigans and malice.
Their checks, and their care, including those in adult care facilities, depends on debt, taxes, and spending.
They can argue about whether or not illegals or retired workers are more deserving; and the moral answer is obvious. But we have immoral leadership in our Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches. So they can argue all they want.
My parents lived in a big 6,000 sq/ft house with a creek out back along with a comfortable life. My dad made $12/hr plus bonus if the company did well. This back in the 60’s and 70’s.
I make more then double and cannot afford that same size home. The gov’t made everything more expensive while exempting themselves. Heck they even have stores charge me 10 cents for grocery bags!
Life punishes people for being less disciplined.
Liberals are perpetual teenagers.
If they're that stupid to try it, they will find a critical mass of citizens who will decide that in order to take away your life's work, then they'll also have to take your life.
Dow up right now, despite disaster looming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.