Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

I have had this type of discussion with science guys that fail to realize that science is based upon philosophy


2 posted on 12/17/2015 10:12:15 PM PST by Fai Mao (I've been wrong before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fai Mao

The philosophical field of Epistemology. The study of how we know what we know.

The scientific method is basically about measurement. But science is built upon assumptions that themselves can’t be measured.


7 posted on 12/17/2015 11:20:14 PM PST by Pelham (Muslim immigration...the enemy is inside the wire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao; LibWhacker
Fai Mao: "I have had this type of discussion with science guys that fail to realize that science is based upon philosophy."

Modern science -- natural science -- is based on at least two great assumptions:

  1. Only natural explanations for natural processes, and
  2. Natural processes operated the same in the distant past as they do today.

This article addresses the question: can an untestable hypothesis be classified as "scientific".
The answer is "no", but scientists can find some wiggle-room in definitions of "test" and "confirmation".

The correct term for untestable hypotheses is "speculation", regardless of how "scientific" it's thinkers may consider themselves.

23 posted on 12/21/2015 3:24:34 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson