Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
I like their use of the phrase "acquired the Moon" - the Moon is clearly not the result of a large impact on the proto-Earth, but a later 'foundling', captured after a series of encounters made over some millions of years.

Nearly all experts today believe the Moon was the result of a very early collision between a Mars-sized planet and the Earth.

18 posted on 01/11/2016 4:20:03 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ETL
Yes, you're right, no doubt about it -- but all those experts are dead wrong . That's based not merely on the implausibility of their model, but also on fossil evidence (there really is some) as well as isotope ratios from lunar surface samples (which are themselves, like the fossils, wrongly used to prop up their impact model). It's a little disorienting, I realize, considering what a deep interest I have in the consequences of impact. :')

20 posted on 01/11/2016 4:48:16 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson