Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dynoman

Why should Cruz have known Canadian law? American law supercedes it, and Ted knows the US Constitution inside out. You know this, but you and others choose to be childish.


56 posted on 01/30/2016 11:09:38 AM PST by alstewartfan ("I came back as a large hippopotamus." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: alstewartfan

American law does not supersede Canadian law. American law app;lies only in America under areas of American jurisdiction. Cruz was born under the jurisdiction of Canadian law. he was born into allegiance to Canada. By every known common law definition of natural born citizen, he is a natural born citizen of Canada and the common law makes no exception for him. He is not elligible to be POTUS. His charade has gone on long enough.


59 posted on 01/30/2016 11:23:20 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: alstewartfan
Cruz was about 3 years old when he was taken to the US. He grew up in the US and always considered himself an American. He never felt any loyalty to Canada or tried to use his Canadian birth to get any rights in Canada. He may not have been aware of his dual citizenship until shortly before he renounced any claim to Canadian citizenship.

The charge that he was an anchor baby in Canada is nonsensical. His mother was residing legally in Canada--she wasn't using her baby as a tactic to be allowed to stay in Canada.

77 posted on 01/30/2016 3:36:01 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson