I’m sorry but I’m just going to copy and paste my standard reply to these arguments. I encourage you to read it and absorb it. It’s slightly advanced material but is really enlightening and worthy of deep contemplation. I would suggest grabbing a beverage and really reading this. That’s what I’m gonna do. cheers.
As I see it, this is not a legal but a constitutional question. Article two is quite brief, except for the length description of the process of choosing the President (and vice president), Brief because the aim was to create an executive who would not be a crowned head. Of course the job description was tailored to fit George Washington, or his twin brother, Further, the executive could not be a European prince, which would turn the country very quickly into a monarchy. Hence he could not be a relative of an European house.