You are on to something here.
Might explain why there are so many unwed mothers in the inner city. The difference? - the women in the inner city are compliant.
Bottom line: the destruction of the traditional family continues.
Compliant? You're kidding, right? Inner city women are matriarchs. They are independent of needing support from any man (thanks to welfare and affirmative action for government jobs). They might allow a man into their bed from time to time if he's charming enough, and if he's enough of a thug to offer some degree of protection from all the other thugs in the hood.
What the "sexual revolution" has done, is to free women from having to have a husband. They now can sleep with a charming, handsome "alpha male" who would never have even looked at her in the days when marriage was required in order to have sex. Freed of any requirement to marry anyone, the Alpha males can hop from woman to woman, choosing the convenience of Beta women who are happy to accept them on whatever terms the man chooses, rather than trying to attract and marry an Alpha woman.
Meanwhile, the Beta males, who in decades past would be able to get SOME sort of woman interested in him, get spurned by women in their 20's and early 30's. When women get in their late 30's, and find the Alpha's are no longer interested, they might allow a Beta to marry their high-mileage selves, to provide a father for another man's children and some support for the women. Don't expect much sex, though. Beta's aren't terribly exciting.