I just see a primitive man with his arms out stretched.
I dont see how this can be considered a crucifix at all.
I agree. That is not a Crucifix.
I have a reproduction of an ancient Celtic cross that’s styled very much like it - except for the flat area behind the hands and feet, indicating the wood of the cross, it doesn’t look like later ones, and has little to indicate that the figure is affixed to a cross. Look beneath the hands and feet - the figure is obviously lying on a flat surface.
-JT