“This moronic mis characterization is NOT simply judging someone on their true character- it’;s judging them on a fictitious characterization of the person they have already deemed guilty before any evidence has surfaced- you seem to ignore that there’s no hard evidence out here but there sure is plenty of filthy minded conjecture regarding Ted- Amanda and others-”
Your own words above contradict your own statements and demonstrate a selective hypocrisy by objecting easily defensible cases while omitting the indefensible cases. Ted Cruz condemned and demanded the firing of Corey Lewandowski for performing his lawful protective duties before discovery, trial, or conviction; yet Ted Cruz and his campaign has demonstrably engaged in what is some highly unethical or perhaps illegal political dirty tricks. You demand proof beyond a reasonable doubt in defense of Cruz, yet subjective allegations and perhaps rumors suffice for opponents of Ted Cruz. It is that kind of apparent hypocrisy which is discrediting what you have to say.
pssst- where’s your hard evidence?
[[yet Ted Cruz and his campaign has demonstrably engaged in what is some highly unethical or perhaps illegal political dirty tricks.]]
Psssst- where’s your evidence? Those are serious allegations- where’s the evidence?
[[It is that kind of apparent hypocrisy which is discrediting what you have to say.]]
BS- anti-Cruz people are doing exactly what i said- taking idiotic RUMORS and inflating them to disgusting proportions because their filthy minds can’t allow them to let the evidence lead where it will and they feel the ‘need’ to ‘help the story along’ by inventing filthy disgusting crap abotu Ted-
Tell me Whisky- where is ted doing Anything even remotely close to that to donald? Nowhere- thats’ where-
[[Ted Cruz condemned and demanded the firing of Corey Lewandowski for performing his lawful protective duties before discovery, trial, or conviction;]]
I’m sorry- how does viewing a video- seeing bruises afterwards, and making a connection between the two even remotely rise to the level of innuendo and filthy Romona mongering that is being done to Ted again?
The crap begin done by anti-Cruz people does not even begin to compare with your example- and it’s a ridiculous claim to make that it shows hypocrisy- There’s a huige difference between seeing something actually happen, and hearing something from someone’s best friend’s neighbor’s sister in law and claiming that is fact- and not only that but running with it and inventing all kinds of crap to ‘support the ‘evidence’- don’t you even try to compare the two-
Keep spinning Whiskey-
[[Although Lewandowski initially admitted fault to Fields’s editor, and the incident last week in Florida was witnessed by a Washington Post reporter and captured on audio and video,]]
[[Sources: Trump Campaign Manager Admits to Allegedly Assaulting Reporter Michelle Fields, Left Her Bruised
During a discussion with Breitbart’s Matt Boyle and reported by The Daily Beast, Lewandowski admitted to grabbing Fields and made the excuse that he didn’t realize she worked for Breitbart, a Trump friendly outlet. ]]
[[”That’s pretty conclusive, even with the freeze framing,” he tweeted, adding: “Clearly I was wrong; @bterris right.” (Ben Terris, a reporter at the Washington Post, witnessed the incident and wrote about it in a story.)]]
Woopsie- Oh darn- it looks Like ted made his rematk based o nseveral key FACTS- Lewandowski it turns out originally admitted he had done it- Lewandowski was charged by police (who generally don’t charge unless they have cause to do so) and video evidence and photo evidence of bruises- Why in the world wouldn’t Ted ask him to resign after his own admission and the other evidence if he worked for him? anti-cruz hacks would be jumping all over Ted to fire him- then ted would fire him and these same hacks would accuse him of trying to cover something up- Generally when someone admits to something it’s pretty good evidence one is guilty-
I must have missed where Ted ‘is demanding that lewandowski be fired’?