[rissole]

that we’re not despicable rumor mongerers with filthy minds and are simply waiting to see if there is any actual evidence before deciding that he is guilty-

I'll say it again: Innocent people not evasive. It doesn't take a genius to see that. ;)

[catfish1957]

I'll say it again: Innocent people not evasive. It doesn't take a genius to see that. ;)

Then provide some proof and settle this thing once and for all.

[Bob434]

I’ll say it again

3: that we’re not despicable rumor mongerers with filthy minds and are simply waiting to see if there is any actual evidence before deciding that he is guilty-

we don;t make up crap about begin ‘evasive’ After he’s already addressed the issue several times, denied the affairs, after she has denied the affairs, etc etc etc- We don’t demand peoepl jump through all kinds of ignorant hoops in order to ‘prove they are innocent’ only to ignore their hoops jumping and demand they jump through more hoops after they do in order to ‘prove they are innocent’ ad nauseum

we simply allow the evidence to surface- or not- We don’t presume guilt before evidence is available- that’s not how the justice system works- an for good reason because it leads to slimy assumptions and speculations and false accusations when people get into a despicable lynch mob mentality-