To: HiTech RedNeck
Well, my hearing is not the best. I heard 25 lbs. but 25 lbs. sounds a lot more reasonable based upon the size of the pond. 25 tons of fish in a pond of that size would mean that the ‘pond’ was all fish and no water. ;-)
19 posted on
04/04/2016 9:09:54 AM PDT by
spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
(Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
Well shoot, 25 pounds is like 15 packages of filleted fish. Why is anyone calling that a farm, not a hobby — and why would it cost $75 grand?
23 posted on
04/04/2016 9:22:49 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
Also, based on an average density close to that of water, this wouldn’t even pack an Olympic size swimming pool. The pool is 660,000 gallons; the fish (if this is tons) is equivalent to 9400 gallons.
24 posted on
04/04/2016 9:26:31 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson