[JimRed]

The list needs to be released, regardless of who it names. let the chips fall where they may. I’ll be surprised if it does not name RATs way more than PUBs, and highly pi$$ed off if it doesn’t (at the PUBs, not the list).

BTW, who would be stupid enough to obtain such services under their own identity?

[silverleaf]

“Don’t fall for liberal lies and please do the research before just believing everything you read on the internet”

Including this article
The phone call record can be more revealing than he states
All it takes is some private detective work
Which can easily be done if not already done

[ro_dreaming]

This time the claims are that Ted Cruz’s name appears on a secret list of clients of a D.C Madam from 30 years ago.

Especially since 30 years ago he was 15.

[napscoordinator]

Well that’s why the list needs released. It’s either Cruz, trump, Kasick, Clinton or Bernie on the list. I think it’s better to find out now rather then October surprise no matter who of the 3 for sure it is.

[Fundamentally Fair]

Well, that has been 100% DEBUNKED!

I hope it's not true. I believe it's not true.

I must have missed the debunking, though.

[JSDude1]

wan wan wan, FAIL..

[Defiant]

The list that has been going around the internet, the one pager with the highlighted calls from Texas, looks very questionable. That is not the list that Sibley is threatening to release. That list has not been released. If Sibley hates Ted Cruz so much, then it is likely that Ted Cruz is the candidate who would be harmed by release of the list. We will find out when and if Sibley releases the list even though the court has ordered that it remain sealed. Only Obama and democrat operatives are allowed to know what’s in such records, and only they can threaten to release them!

[NoCmpromiz]

Well, look. Here's one for the FR research arm.

According to that anthology of the compiled knowledge of the universe, aka Wikipedia in their article on Deborah Jeane Palfrey, aka The DC Madam, those records have already been released.

Quote:
On July 9, 2007, Palfrey released the supposed entirety of her phone records for public viewing and downloading on the Internet in TIFF format, though days prior to this, her civil attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley had dispatched 54 CD-ROM copies to researchers, activists, and journalists. Senator David Vitter (R-LA) acknowledged on the night of July 9 that he had been a customer of her escort service.

So maybe someone should go find either the .tiff or one of those CD-roms. Seems that once something hits the internet it never disappears, and 54 cd-roms must of certainty have become pregnant and birthed multiple children over the years. Shouldn't be too difficult to make one or the other float to the top of the pond.

That would certainly disspell or verify any current rumors, wouldn't it?

[faucetman]

I hope I’m not on the list, my wife would be PISSED!

“WHAT!, you spent $300 on a hooker?”

[Robert DeLong]

This time the claims are that Ted Cruz’s name appears on a secret list of clients of a D.C Madam from 30 years ago. Well, that has been 100% DEBUNKED!

First off it wasn't 30 years ago, it was 15 years ago as clearly seen in the list above. Also, I love how the author claims it has been 100% debunked yet provides not one shred of evidence to support the supposed claim of it being debunking.

The Ashley Madison hack is back after the Supreme Court adds the DC Madam phone list to the docket.

therightperspective.org

I don't know if it is true or not, but refusing to bring suit doesn't help Ted for sure. If it were me and it was clearly a smear that I knew was false, I would be suing the pants off of the owner of the National Enquirer.

[PghBaldy]

Actually, the secret list has not been published yet. Think it is names and SS numbers of 874 people, IIRC. What is around now is old files, released years ago and on the net for years too.