Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: thoughtomator
Lololol!
THAT is their plan?? Beavers?? Seriously?
2 posted on
04/13/2016 8:54:08 AM PDT by
bill1952
(taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
To: thoughtomator
Not a bad idea, no way would the environmental wackos let them build man made dams so why not let the Beavers do it. Who is going to sue q beaver....
To: thoughtomator
5 posted on
04/13/2016 8:56:02 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: thoughtomator
The title, that’s good right there. Heh.
6 posted on
04/13/2016 8:56:27 AM PDT by
loungitude
(The truth hurts.)
To: thoughtomator
7 posted on
04/13/2016 8:56:43 AM PDT by
PROCON
To: thoughtomator
These idiots have no idea what will happen. The beavers will end up in ponds and undermine the earth dams. They don’t build where we need them, they choose the areas where they will be the most problematic. Beavers here damage trees and stock ponds.
To: thoughtomator
10 posted on
04/13/2016 8:57:31 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: thoughtomator
This thread is going places.
11 posted on
04/13/2016 8:57:51 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: thoughtomator
I’m looking at the headline. And all I can see is .... wet beavers...
Yeah. I know where my mind is. Can’t help it.
12 posted on
04/13/2016 8:57:56 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(Plan A. Split the GOP. Plan B. Hillary Wins!)
To: thoughtomator
Are they taking California Girls?
I am all for dat!
14 posted on
04/13/2016 8:58:26 AM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
((VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!))
To: thoughtomator
16 posted on
04/13/2016 8:59:36 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
To: thoughtomator
But beavers chop down trees... and environmentalists hate that! What a dilemma.
To: thoughtomator
CA already has plenty of beavers spreading up and down the state.
21 posted on
04/13/2016 9:03:59 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: thoughtomator
22 posted on
04/13/2016 9:04:24 AM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: thoughtomator
So, human-made dams that provide power and mitigation of flooding = bad. Beaver-made dams that do not provide power, flood random areas, and cut off water to random areas = good?
Okie day...
23 posted on
04/13/2016 9:04:33 AM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(I got nothin'.)
To: thoughtomator
I cannot disagree with any plan that involves spreading beavers
24 posted on
04/13/2016 9:04:33 AM PDT by
Mr. K
To: thoughtomator; All
Using beavis and butthead laugh...uuuuuggggghhhhhhhhh, hhhhuuuuhhhhhh, he said “...moist...Beavers.” hhhhuuuuuhhhhh.
25 posted on
04/13/2016 9:05:12 AM PDT by
areukiddingme1
(areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
To: thoughtomator
I can just see all the gazillion water regulators, so used to munching on the sustenance of the people (OK, maybe not the best metaphor), giving up all their petty tyranny so a bunch of wild animals can do the job faster, cheaper, and more intelligently than they can.
27 posted on
04/13/2016 9:05:35 AM PDT by
lafroste
To: thoughtomator
The Plan to Make California Wet By Spreading Beavers Up and Down the State I'm only here for the pictures.
28 posted on
04/13/2016 9:05:49 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
To: thoughtomator; All
30 posted on
04/13/2016 9:06:26 AM PDT by
Mr. K
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
