[Gaffer]

No sir. Your ‘reminder’ is as fallacious as your arguments. I did not qualify which ‘voters’ in Colorado were denied the opportunity. Only that the ‘en masse’ was completely denied. Bias much?

The truth is that I’d have been completely happy with a total vote of registered Republicans deciding the winner. You on the other hand go to extremes to excuse party manipulation and wholesale refusal to consider ALL the voters’ preferences over party politics that are evidenced by the #NEVERTRUMP victory announcement on their own damned website (that was ‘ooga booga’ mysteriously hacked).

Get real.

You’re the fraud.

[nathanbedford]

I said, "The truth of this rule is confirmed by the fact that Trump supporters never complain about the rules which "unfairly" advantage them by awarding them more delegates than their percentage would warrant."

The only reasonable interpretation of that is that we were talking in that context about voters en masse.

In reply you said,

And which 'vote' is that? The ones where normal voters actually were allowed to vote en masse

We are clearly talking about mass voting in which Trump was getting delegates in fact more delegates than their percentage of Trump of voters voting in mass would warrant.

At this point I simply acknowledged the possibility that Trump voters we were talking about could be "normal." I now know that is as questionable about Trump supporters in this forum who are clearly are even less normal in their reasoning powers.

I come to the judgment about you for the purely gratuitous and unwarranted remarks at the foot of your reply:

Get real.

You’re the fraud.

At least you had the good grace to refrain from ending your fatuous reply with "LOL."

[kiryandil]

The blowhard never quits, does he? :)