Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw

The format itself isn’t terribly efficient, it seems efficient because it’s better than Word, but that’s the kind of curve grading that let’s bad software seem good. And the Acrobat Reader is just plain a hunk of junk, bigger, slower and less stable every revision.


9 posted on 05/16/2016 11:42:54 AM PDT by discostu (Joan Crawford has risen from the grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: discostu; dennisw
Use Foxit Reader for PDFs. It's got about one-third the RAM footprint that Adobe Acroshat has.

Acroshat is NOT allowed on my machines.

Nowadays, I "print" pretty much everything to PDF in Chrome (in lieu of actually printing it).

That way, I don't have to mess with saved html - and I get everything that I want.

When I want to look at it, Foxit snaps it onto the screen.

11 posted on 05/16/2016 1:58:40 PM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

One good thing about PDF is that any computer or mobile device can understand and read it right away. PDF has been around forever and IIRC it was the first format that you were easily able to get to print out the way it looked on the computer screen. WYSIWYG.

Now I see the Adobe Acrobat wiki and it has only been around since 1993. I thought it had been around since 1983.


19 posted on 05/16/2016 9:02:50 PM PDT by dennisw (The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson