Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: huldah1776
'BLATANTLY ILLEGAL': 17 newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser

This article says they strip out the ads supplied with websites and substitute their own, which are presumably less dangerous. On the surface, this doesn't sound as good as running Firefox with crap-blocking security add-ons.

But one side effect of running Firefox with crap-blocking security add-ons is that the developers of many legitimate websites are incompetent and use a lot of crap which, if blocked, will cripple the web site. Does Brave solve this problem? I.e., does it manage to block the crap without crippling legitimate but poorly implemented websites?

11 posted on 06/01/2016 11:27:14 AM PDT by snarkpup (I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snarkpup
'BLATANTLY ILLEGAL': 17 newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser

I went to view the link to that article in IE, and it froze! When I viewed it in Brave, it worked just fine. Proof enough for me. How ironic!

28 posted on 06/01/2016 11:52:50 AM PDT by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson