Have we been wrong all this time and succumbed to some overblown hype from the beginning?
1 posted on
06/23/2016 10:08:42 PM PDT by
Utilizer
To: Utilizer
Advertising itself is inherently malware. If I can’t view a site without ads, I don’t visit that site.
Which, in combination with Javascript blocking, is how I get away with not running an anti-virus (to kill my machine resources) and still never get any malware.
2 posted on
06/23/2016 10:14:07 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Wisdom is doing due diligence before forming an opinion)
To: Utilizer
The linked article is based on this interesting publication (it's really an ad) by Geoedge:
http://www.geoedge.com/downloads/documents/Security_Aspects_of_HTML5_in_Video_Ads.pdf?ge_campaign=html5_video
From the Geoedge link:
Security:
Flash vulnerabilities allow for malicious software to install on a users computer silently. Currently, HTML5 has no vulnerability that would allow malicious software to install on a users computer silently. HTML5 alerts the user whenever an install attempt is made.
It sounds like Javascript in HTML5 can be exploited, but overall HTML5 is still safer than Flash.
Also, DON'T CLICK ON POPUPS!
4 posted on
06/23/2016 11:56:19 PM PDT by
TChad
To: Utilizer
Ads should just be static.... like in the newspapers. And not suck away valuable resources.
5 posted on
06/24/2016 4:08:32 AM PDT by
exPBRrat
To: Utilizer
95% of Internet traffic and time is ads.
7 posted on
06/24/2016 7:58:31 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
To: Swordmaker; dayglored; ShadowAce
8 posted on
06/25/2016 5:44:37 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson