Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer; SunkenCiv; BenLurkin; humblegunner; fhayek; Larry Lucido; Salamander
What I don't get from the article is if the consumed were relatives from the same tribe or victims of a raid.

Chimpanzees are known to raid rival tribes and eat the victims - it's a prize but they won't eat their own (I assume).

If the consumed are victims of raids then I kind of wonder if that is one of the origins of burials (evidence the Neanderthal's practiced it). If you bury your dead they can't be eaten by animals or rivals?

Also explains the small % of Neanderthal DNA. It was probably from war boot slaves from homo sapiens sapiens raiding Neanderthals?

34 posted on 07/08/2016 12:24:27 PM PDT by Trumpinator ("Are you Batman?" the boy asked. "I am Batman," Trump said. youtube.com/watch?v=HZA9k7WAuiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Trumpinator

It probably has to do with a previously unattested ingress of another human relative, such as “gracile” “anatomically modern” jokers who killed and ate their victims, then moved on.


41 posted on 07/09/2016 9:03:54 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson