Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Adder
We have couples buying group who now have to have 2 policies if their employers each offer group: you can’t pick the best one: if your employer offers insurance you have to take it.

It could be worse. Firms don't have to keep premiums low for non working spouses and dependents. People in that situation can't buy cheaper insurance on exchanges even if their income is in the subsidy range.

9 posted on 08/19/2016 3:09:20 AM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: EVO X

We have the situation where the company “provides” insurance for the employees but the spouse has to have a separate policy. One poor guy to cover his wife is paying $750/mo in addition to his own contribution to the group policy. His renewal notice for his wife said it will be close to $1,000/mo and thats with a $5,000 deductible.

They took a system with flaws where everyone WAS covered, even if they shifted the cost, doubled and tripled the costs, forced deductibles so high you may as well not have insurance and claim they did something so great.

In a time not too long ago, these people would have been wearing feathers and tar or be hanging from trees.

Despicable liars, every damn one of them.


12 posted on 08/19/2016 6:02:37 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson