Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

Committing a crime is not “speech”. Molesting minors is a crime.

If the wanted to make a case that it was “speech” they would have to take it to court, probably all the way to the SC and I’m pretty sure they would lose.

For example, you can talk about murder in general, how you’d like to murder (not a specific person but you just want to do it). You could even start up an organization of people who would like to murder people, or talk about murder in general, ways to do it etc. But if you ACT on it, then you’ve committed a crime and can be arrested and hopefully put away for life.


34 posted on 09/14/2016 12:12:08 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

You seem to be begging the question. If you define a certain type of speech as a crime, than it’s not speech.

Is public nudity a crime? It is arguably “victimless,” and doesn’t cost anyone for it to be allowed. Forget the irrelevant arguments of “public health,” those are provably false. What if someone claims that walking in the nude down the street is their form of “speech?”


41 posted on 09/14/2016 1:26:10 PM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson