Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cobra64

I also backed up my boldest claims with links.

Research done unless you can add something.


21 posted on 09/26/2016 7:28:18 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (ICANN giveaway complete after Friday. Call Congress. Yes to SB3031 HR5418)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: All

Regarding Rosenzweig’s concerns about .mil and .gov ...

[quote]

9This reaffirmation was made through an exchange of letters.16 Not only are the letters non-legally binding, they actually acknowledge the possibility that at some point a separation of the IANA functionfrom ICANN might threaten the stability and security of the US government’s top level domains. I can’t speak for other observers, but for me, as a lawyer, an exchange of letters is a way of avoiding acontractually enforceable obligation. I know why ICANN would prefer that course of action – I have noidea why the NTIA would accept it on behalf of the US government.


22 posted on 09/26/2016 7:32:01 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (ICANN giveaway complete after Friday. Call Congress. Yes to SB3031 HR5418)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson