Posted on 10/15/2016 4:42:30 PM PDT by generally
I have always assumed that Hitlery set up her personal email server in order to prevent having a record of her criminal acts on the government server that was subject to FOIA and could be seen by various government personnel.
So my questions are these:
1.a. Are Hitlery and all those who were involved in this deception so incredibly stupid that they really thought the server they set up so amateurishly would be secure?
1. b. Are Hitlery's minions so intimidated by her that they would do something this stupid without explaining to her or convincing her of the pitfalls?
1. c. Or did someone talk Hitlery into doing this in order to sabotage either her or the US?
2. If they are not that stupid, then what did they expect would happen when the emails were hacked by hostile intelligence services?
3. What did they expect would happen when the emails became public?
4. Have we seen the worst emails yet? Any guesses as to what might be coming?
5. Is there any point at which Hitlery would not continue to brazen it out? Has she no shame? (Rhetorical)
6. Is the stress of knowing what emails haven't been released yet, but might be soon, having any noticeable effect on an already ill and stressed and mentally unhealthy woman?
7. Where are the yoga emails???
Their purpose, as nearly as can be determined based on the outcome, was to obstruct FOIA requests, and hide their illegal mingling of State Dept. business and Clinton Foundation business. And, due to whatever they have on Comey, it looks like they have been successful (in the main).
They knew they could get away with it.
You ask some good questions.
Regarding Hillary’s lackeys and hangers-on, I believe they are all afraid of her. So, regarding that, I think that Hillary is surrounded by “yes men”, and they were afraid to bring up predictable consequences such as you mentioned. Hillary was hell bent on doing things this way, and any who objected would be thrown out of Hillaryland.
I would think SOMEONE would have said...”here are my concerns” and listed them...but she overrode them.
1a=. PRN must have been excellent salesmen. The first IT flunkie that worked for Cankles must be a world class BS’er.
4=. We haven’t seen nothing yet. It gets much better.
It was done to hide her activity which is certainly criminal.
Giuliani said he could convict her on 26 counts and I suspect he understated that number.
The fact that a taxi driver could get into the server is astonishing.
Comey did not recommend prosecution because he is a dirty cop.
I generally refrain from calling the other side stupid, but it seems to me in the case of online security, they really are this stupid. Just the Podesta dump we see he shared login credentials (which were same as Twitter and likely other sites) and even his AmEx card info. There are other instances of poor online security practices in other dumps (login credentials) and then the dubious question posed to Reddit by one of her hired sys admins, the people she employs are weighted by loyalty over competence for certain.
What other email platforms did she use?
Yes, Hillary overrode anyone who did say anything.
That’s what happens when you have an organization where people are afraid of the top dogs. I would not be surprised if some people were fired from Hillaryland for voicing concerns.
OK I will take a stab at some of these:
1.a. Are Hitlery and all those who were involved in this deception so incredibly stupid that they really thought the server they set up so amateurishly would be secure?
Hillary is computer illiterate and one nasty boss. So my read is that people who knew better just kept their mouth shut rather than contradicting her and facing her wrath.
1. b. Are Hitlery’s minions so intimidated by her that they would do something this stupid without explaining to her or convincing her of the pitfalls?
Yes.
1. c. Or did someone talk Hitlery into doing this in order to sabotage either her or the US?
No evidence supports that view (so far), but who knows.
2. If they are not that stupid, then what did they expect would happen when the emails were hacked by hostile intelligence services?
Since Hillary took money from everyone and doled out favors to all who paid, in her view there was no such thing as a “hostile intelligence service”.
3. What did they expect would happen when the emails became public?
If that happened they would have the media cover for her. She had a bunch of agents in place and moles in all key media outlets.
4. Have we seen the worst emails yet? Any guesses as to what might be coming?
I believe there are many bad ones left. Certainly the Scalia death is a topic of interest since Podesta mentioned “wetwork” in passing. We will certainly learn more about Hillary’s moles in the media and elsewhere in DC. There could be some big surprises. There could be other types of corruption we don’t know about yet.
5. Is there any point at which Hitlery would not continue to brazen it out? Has she no shame? (Rhetorical)
She has no shame. She will lie, attack Trump, play wag the dog with Obozo, conspire with the FBI to cause false flag domestic terror, whatever it takes.
6. Is the stress of knowing what emails haven’t been released yet, but might be soon, having any noticeable effect on an already ill and stressed and mentally unhealthy woman?
Hillary is a heartless sociopath and will just attack anyone who gets in her way as a matter of routine. The only thing that seems to rattle her is when Trump mentions the “jail” word. :-)
So my questions are these:
1.a. Are Hitlery and all those who were involved in this deception so incredibly stupid that they really thought the server they set up so amateurishly would be secure?
Yes
1. b. Are Hitlery’s minions so intimidated by her that they would do something this stupid without explaining to her or convincing her of the pitfalls?
Yes
1. c. Or did someone talk Hitlery into doing this in order to sabotage either her or the US?
No
2. If they are not that stupid, then what did they expect would happen when the emails were hacked by hostile intelligence services?
Didn’t think so.
3. What did they expect would happen when the emails became public?
Thought that they could brush it off. After all the Rupubs haven’t been able to get anything to stick as yet.
4. Have we seen the worst emails yet? Any guesses as to what might be coming?
No, there has been promises by Wikileaks and others that there is more and it is way more damaging.
5. Is there any point at which Hitlery would not continue to brazen it out? Has she no shame? (Rhetorical)
No need to answer this one you already know the answer.
6. Is the stress of knowing what emails haven’t been released yet, but might be soon, having any noticeable effect on an already ill and stressed and mentally unhealthy woman?
Sure that they are. There has been talk that she doesn’t need to go to the 3rd debate, so she won’t need to answer any questions.
7. Where are the yoga emails???
And the wedding plans for CVC.
The next AG may choose to prosecute her. She has not been exonerated by any stretch of the imagination.
you beat me by a few seconds with the same format, and most likely the same answers. LOL
Where are the yoga emails???
I was looking forward to the emails on Chelsea’s wedding plans.
Using the existing government systems and Blackberries was too “inconvenient”. She flat out refused to use them.
Instead she set up her own insecure systems and personal Blackberry and other handhelds, which took time and money, and certainly is not more convenient. These systems were neither secured nor in compliance with record retention requirements.
She enriched herself by doling out State Department favors to Clinton Foundation donors. Using secured systems with those pesky record retention requirements would be inconvenient for her criminal activities.
There was high stress in Hitler’s bunker, stress that got to their Fuhrer.
At some points looking at maps he was pushing around IMAGINARY army units —units that had long since been destroyed.
How many people here think subordinates STOPPED him and pointed that out to him..?
And so I think it is with Hillary.
A big part of respect is FEAR.
Terrific answers! Thanks.
I especially appreciated 2. I hadn’t thought of that!
A big part of what is coming out is the extent to which lib pols can rely on the MSM to crush reporting critical of Progressivism.
I can remember when Drudge was still small and Monica Mess Reports were still new that all the tiny Monica details were raging here every day —we had very many consummate experts.
FOR MONTHS THAT CONTINUED.
Every day Drudge would have fresh headlines, and they went TOTALLY ignored by the MSM. FR grew and grew, some threads going into THOUSANDS of comments, people teaching each other, correcting, bringing one another up to speed.
It was like two Media Universes, parallel but somehow completely invisible to each other. There was an amazing hermetic seal.
That seal has broken down, however there is some MSM and LibPol cognitive dissonance —they’re still sometimes behaving as if they have a reliable media monopoly.
THAT is why it’s so amazing to us.
There is something else —their self-assurance of ABSOLUTE SUPERIORITY.
After WW2 our top guys layed out very clearly to the Japanese how we had completely broken their codes, yet STILL they could not believe it.
“No...! For them this is impossible...NO ONE can understand us, certainly not THEM..!”
The libs are like that too —the Americans have shown up in EXACTLY the right spot at EXACTLY the right time, with the Jap carriers all aflame.
Yet they disbelieve.
AND THAT IS GOOD.
There is a law against destroying government property. Anyone who does so CANNOT hold public office in the USA.
Hillary CANNOT hold public office in the USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.