Just another reason that DST is stupid
They should use Greenwich Mean Time as the criteria.
If delivery of the second twin could have been held off for an hour, they could have been born simultaneously.
There is no twist. It’s obvious who is older. The foolishness of changing the setting of a clock means that the clock registers the same time twice in the same night, in direct contradiction with reality.
I’m against Daylight Savings Time. That extra hour of sunlight is what is causing global warming.
Twenty years from now, poor Aubrey is gonna finally bust and scream “SHUT UP! JUST SHUT THE HELL UP, BOTH OF YOU!! I DON’T WANT TO HEAR THIS STUPID ANECDOTE AGAIN! SHUT UPPPPPPPPP!! GAAAAHHHH!!”
Yawn.
I know a set of twins that were born around midnight - one just before, and one after - one day difference in their birthdays.
cool as if each twin is born in a different year and first born is considered a year older. /s
I won’t say that the following tops this but in terms of financial impact, it can be a doozy and it happens with some frequency!
Same circumstances, but at December 31st with the second child born after midnight on January 1st. Thus the older twin has a prior year birthdate to the younger twin.
Tax law goes by calendar year so the parents get the ‘Child Tax Credit’ for the 1st child on that year’s tax return. They cannot claim the second twin until the following year. However they both get the 16 years so the second twin claims in the year when the first twin exceeds that age.
It is unknown to me if hospitals have any leeway to modify the times of birth to fit both into the prior year. Logically speaking, it is a SINGLE birth event BUT since when does logic trump rules and regulations.
My nephew-in-law born some days ago is also named Samuel. :)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel
Nice story...