Kind of an aside, but I think we need to be careful when talking about “real moms”. Adoption is a beautiful, God ordained process that makes families out of heartache. And making an issue out of the “real mom” not being there could be hurtful to those affected by adoption through no fault of their own.
HOWEVER, in the instance of homosexual “marriage”, the real tragedy is that children are INTENTIONALLY DENIED the relationship with their biological mother or father. It’s ordained by the State. And it’s really sick.
The innocent child in this story might be biologically related to one of the “dads”, but the poor thing will purposely never be allowed to know his mother. I think the fallout from the children of homosexual “marriage” is going to be immense once they are all old enough to realize they are missing an important person in their lives. The person who was intentionally excluded all in the name of “love”.
I apologize if my post suggested that adoptive moms weren’t real moms. I was referring to the fact that in this day of gender neutral, fluid biology, whatever the hell that means, you can’t label a parent “mom” or “dad”, “mother” or “father”. And, I totally agree with you about the label “real mom” when referring to the biological mother as hurtful and offensive. Adoptive moms ARE real moms and I cringe when children are identified as adopted when they are introduced or spoken about. Authentic families don’t have to be blood families. Merry Christmas to you both!