Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

The whole scenario is totally dependent on the probability of a potential victim being able to kill the zombie before being bitten. In some places, the zombies would win. In other places, people would be able to shoot the zombies.

It also depends on how hard to kill the zombies are (Will one fall with a shot that would kill a normal human? Will one only fall from a head shot? Is it a supernatural zombie which requires complete dismemberment?)


29 posted on 01/05/2017 2:05:34 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

The whole scenario is totally dependent on the probability of a potential victim being able to kill the zombie before being bitten. In some places, the zombies would win. In other places, people would be able to shoot the zombies.


In the original study, there was no factor to consider defense against zombies. Zombies were not killed.

They did a follow up study that considered defense. Guess what? Humanity won.

It was just a study to show who epidemics worked for a class. Nothing serious.


37 posted on 01/05/2017 2:13:42 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

WRONG

The scenario depends on whether the zombies are “fast zombies” such as in World War Z or “slow zombies” such as in The Walking Dead.

I hate fast zombies.


89 posted on 01/05/2017 3:15:58 PM PST by nitzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson