Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton

Fake Intel has always been around.

The Soviets used to call it “disinformation”.

The disturbing thing is that our top intel officials apparently can’t tell the difference.


7 posted on 01/12/2017 8:02:38 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog

True. But Fake Intel in this context is internal focused. Pretty much propaganda against our own citizens, which is illegal for the CIA to focus inward.


10 posted on 01/12/2017 8:04:21 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Lately a lot of events have led me to believe that at least many ‘top politicians’ are really ignorant about the technology and culture of the Internet; which makes it dangerous to them, and their ignorance is also dangerous to us.


11 posted on 01/12/2017 8:05:48 AM PST by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, If you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Fake Intel has always been around.

The Soviets used to call it “disinformation”.

The disturbing thing is that our top intel officials apparently can’t tell the difference.

 

Who says our top intel couldn't tell the difference? I say they knew it was a hoax but ran with it anyway. Just like the media - they pulled out all the stops to elect Hitlery.

 

13 posted on 01/12/2017 8:10:49 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
PEOTUS knows all about disinformation.

Slightly more than a week after winning the 2016 Presidential Election, the head of the NSA Cyber Command, Admiral Mike Rogers, went to New York and met with the new President-Elect Donald Trump inside Trump Tower.

A month prior to that specific visit, DNI Director James Clapper advised President Obama to fire Admiral Mike Rogers.

There is every indication, every reason to believe, that Admiral Rogers gave President-elect Donald Trump a very specific “head’s up“; warning the incoming president of actions which would be undertaken by political operatives within the intelligence community to undermine the construct of the incoming administration.

All activity from that mid-November meeting through to now, points to Rogers giving advanced notice to Trump of a political intelligence scheme which culminated today with the public embarrassment of the those politicized intelligence agencies, operatives and their vessels for disinformation – the media.

Following the meeting with Donald Trump, it clearly appears Admiral Mike Rogers went back into the matrix and, as an outcome of his position, followed orders – but did so with an arms length approach.  The NSA (Rogers) did not support the political intelligence “high confidence” narrative as it was constructed by James Clapper (DNI) and John Brennan (CIA).

We’ll never know what subtle action was taken, or not taken, by Rogers which ultimately culminated in a completely false assertion from “leakers” within the “intelligence community” about a fake report promoted by CNN.  –SEE HERE

However, we can be certain the details of the claim by CNN was entirely disinformation -false information- perhaps intended to discover internal intelligence agency leakers/operatives.


 

Tripwire Alert – The Intelligence Shadow War Final Act…


16 posted on 01/12/2017 8:15:51 AM PST by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
The disturbing thing is that our top intel officials apparently can’t tell the difference.

I'm pretty sure our top intel officials are Soviets.

23 posted on 01/12/2017 8:38:22 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
The disturbing thing is that our top intel officials apparently can’t tell the difference.

What if they can tell the difference? Wouldn't that make it even more disturbing?

Let that implication sink in.

30 posted on 01/12/2017 8:50:05 AM PST by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson