Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj

Beatty’s last chance at a modicum of relevance. He’s probably insanely pissed that his last movie was seen by less people than will read this post.

By now it’s as clear as the day is long that the Oscars are nothing more than a televised PC pat-on-the-back party.

What they’ve become is pathetic. But since all liberals can do is destroy, not surprising.


49 posted on 02/27/2017 3:48:13 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: GOPsterinMA; Impy
If this year's Oscar boycott was anything like this year's NFL "boycott", we can expect it will generate record numbers of people tuning in.

The 2017 Superbowl made billions and and was one of the most watched TV broadcasts of all time, but some conservatives on the internet were still insisting the boycott was "working" and somehow hurt the NFL and Colin Kaepernick. If that's a successful boycott, I'd hate to see what an unsuccessful one looks like. I wonder how many of the people who loudly declared at the start of the season that they "won't be watching" actually DID turn off the boob tube on Superbowl Sunday. Probably the same number of Hollywood celebs who actually left the country after Trump was elected. People always pound their chest and talk a good game, but it means nothing.

As for me, I didn't watch this year's Superbowl OR this year's Academy Awards. Unlike the two teams playing the superbowl, I actually DO have an interest in which films win, so I check out the results the next day, but I don't watch the awards because they are too long and always a bunch of snobby people patting themselves on the back. I watched last year's oscars only to give the middle finger to the Black Lives Matter crowd who were complaining the Oscars were racist against black people.

My objection isn't so much that Hollywood is biased against conservative filmmakers (Mel Gibson did get nominated this year in spite of how many people loathe him), but that Hollywood always gives the top prize to some tear-jerker historical melodrama and snubs genres I like, such as sci-fi and fantasy. I'm ticked that Suicide Squad won Best Makeup for Jared Leto's tattooed Joker and Harley Quinn looking like a heroin addict, instead of Star Trek Beyond which rightfully deserved the prize. And the only "Best Picture" nominee I've seen is the sci-fi film Arrival. It was a great movie but only took home one minor technical award. At least it was nominated in 7 other categories. I highly recommend it.

Have no idea what La-La Land or Moonlight is about. Most of the recent Best Picture winners have been disappointment... I was really looking forward to seeing 2014's Best Picture winner Birdman (casting Michael Keaton as a washed up actor who used to play a superhero was perfect casting) and it turned out to be some tedious artsy-fartsy movie that I could barely sit thru. 12 Years a Slave was also hard to sit through. I finally saw 2008's winner Slumdog Millionaire, which had its moments (the music score was very good) but was too disjointed and dour for me to enjoy. Life of Pi was much better.

There are thousands of movies every year, its interesting to see which ones win the top prize for being "the best", even if we tend to heavily disagree with the decisions, like who gets the Noble Prize each year.

53 posted on 02/27/2017 12:13:59 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson