Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Roman_War_Criminal

None of that was true about young people in the late 1800s, though. If colorectal cancer rates were high then, it can’t be attributed to the evils of 21st century lifestyles.


25 posted on 03/09/2017 3:43:29 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind. ~ Hosea 8:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Pining_4_TX

Wasn’t the whole point that colorectal cancer rates were almost non-existent in the late 1800’s?


30 posted on 03/09/2017 3:48:48 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX
None of that was true about young people in the late 1800s, though. If colorectal cancer rates were high then, it can’t be attributed to the evils of 21st century lifestyles.

The higher incidence in the two different periods may be from different causes. In the 1800s it may have been from carcinogens in what people ate or in drinking water. Nowadays it may be from something like eating too much McDonalds food over a period of decades.

34 posted on 03/09/2017 3:54:26 PM PST by Wissa (Cats don't make long-term plans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson