Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aaron Hernandez Murder Conviction Expected to Be Vacated by ‘Quirky’ Rule
KFOR ^ | APRIL 19, 2017

Posted on 04/19/2017 2:31:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Aaron Hernandez’s murder conviction is expected to be dismissed posthumously because of a legal rule called “abatement.”

That would mean, legally speaking, Aaron Hernandez died an innocent man.

Hernandez hanged himself in his prison cell and was found dead early Wednesday morning, the Massachusetts Department of Correction said. Hernandez had been serving a sentence of life in prison without parole after being convicted of the June 2013 murder of Odin Lloyd.

(Excerpt) Read more at kfor.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous; Sports
KEYWORDS: aaronhernandez; belichick; patriots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2017 2:31:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

How is that possible?..............


2 posted on 04/19/2017 2:33:39 PM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

He is dead Jim.


3 posted on 04/19/2017 2:33:46 PM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“How is that possible?..............”

Read the article. It is very clear.


4 posted on 04/19/2017 2:36:07 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

no civil case. looks like Aaron was looking out for the family...


5 posted on 04/19/2017 2:36:33 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I read it.
It’s sounds like liberal claptrap.
Abatement means anyone who has any claims against the dead convict’s property estate because of the criminal conviction is now screwed, with no appeal..................


6 posted on 04/19/2017 2:39:46 PM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just when you think it’s over the story takes another turn.


7 posted on 04/19/2017 2:41:31 PM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just in time...

On the other hand, maybe Raymond Reddington gave him a choice...


8 posted on 04/19/2017 2:43:40 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Abatement means anyone who has any claims against the dead convict’s property estate because of the criminal conviction is now screwed, with no appeal..................”

Criminal convictions do not secure civil claims. That would be a civil lawsuit. I don’t know if there are any. If there are, the suit rolls over to the estate.


9 posted on 04/19/2017 2:46:44 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drewh

no civil case. looks like Aaron was looking out for the family...

...

There can still be a civil case, but the plaintiff can no longer use the conviction as a fact that he wronged the plaintiff. They’d have to establish it again from scratch.

This is assuming he had any assets left.


10 posted on 04/19/2017 2:50:03 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Don’t do it.


11 posted on 04/19/2017 2:50:32 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is a dreadful rule which should be abolished. The criminal trial is the full process. A defendant is presumed innocent until convicted in a criminal trial, but not afterwards. An appeal of that does not carry a presumption of innocence. The legal presumption of innocence ends with a criminal conviction. An appeal carries a legal presumption of guilt with the burden being on the appellant to prove wrongful conviction. This rule is a perversion of justice.
12 posted on 04/19/2017 3:00:02 PM PDT by NRx (A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Great! The Raiders can sign him! He can be a decoy for the receivers. < /S >


13 posted on 04/19/2017 3:03:00 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Man-made global liberalism is killing the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It is not “quirky”. The criminal conviction was on appeal; never finalized.


14 posted on 04/19/2017 3:04:36 PM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Isn’t it ironic, don’t ya think?


15 posted on 04/19/2017 3:07:24 PM PDT by Flag_This (Liberals are locusts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I would guess there’s not much of an estate left.


16 posted on 04/19/2017 3:08:14 PM PDT by Andy'smom (Proud member of the basket of deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drewh
no civil case

Not true. It means that anybody having a civil suit will have a slightly more difficult time proving liability. A final unappealable conviction in a criminal case is pretty much iron clad proof of liability in a civil case because the standard for a criminal conviction is beyond a reasonable doubt. Now that final conviction in the criminal case is not available to any civil plaintiffs in the Hernandez case they will have to prove that he did the deed by a preponderance of the evidence, which should not be too difficult.

17 posted on 04/19/2017 3:11:28 PM PDT by KevinB (Barack Obama: The best example in history of the dangers of affirmative action!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This seems like a goofy law to me.


18 posted on 04/19/2017 3:22:46 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“When I saw some of the s-— he was able to get away with [at Florida], we weren’t taking him. He actually thought he was going to get away with murder. He always thought he could beat the system, and when he got arrested I thought, ‘Well, the system finally caught up with him.’”

An NFL executive on Aaron Hernandez’s past


19 posted on 04/19/2017 3:45:40 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Ken Lay of the Enron scandal took the same route; supposedly died of a heart attack. Nearly $45M at stake, I suspect he’s alive and living overseas.


20 posted on 04/19/2017 5:28:53 PM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson