Posted on 05/08/2017 7:14:42 AM PDT by McGruff
On Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, implying Sally Yates could have leaked classified information to the press, just hours leading up to the former Attorney Generals hearing before the Senate.
Trump said, in what appears to be a statement directed at the Senate, that Yates should be asked if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to the White House council.
(Excerpt) Read more at sarahpalin.com ...
Trump seems nervous.
That is all there is too it.
I agree. I hope Jeff Sessions is working on a list of these people, developing the cases.
I take it more as he has information. Wants it brought to light.
I keep wondering what this was about.
Mystery: President Trump Delays Leaving Air Force One for Forty-Five Minutes on Return to DC Sunday Night
Related maybe?
Trump has nothing to be nervous about. Dumb comment.
But is it enough for prosecution?
Maybe for the first time, she will spell out exactly how the Russians interfered in the election. The concept has been referenced a million times, but no one has actually spelled out how it happened, they just know it did. The Wikileaks aspect has never been tied to the Russians.
I want to know how the Russians forced all of us to vote for Trump. And how they forced us to be repulsed by Hillary for 30 years.
Nope, nervous people don’t want subjects to come up, this is exactly opposite. Let’s see if she takes the 5th.
Her predictable answer: “No.”
Then she will either take the fifth or drink one or both.
Not nervous...anxious to get her to incriminate herself publicly and under oath.
McMaster......out. Did Rice tell Yates what he told her?
Nothing like speculation sans evidence....
Hilarious sketch. She would have to plead the 5th from the start of the hearing. If she began testimony, she would be obliged to answer under oath or be held in contempt.
He HAS to do this, because the U.S. Senate is a den of traitors.
She has to take the fifth at the beginning of proceedings. You can’t invoke the 5th amendment mid-way through testimony.
If they do ask her that question she’ll just fall back on Taqiya under cover her 1st amendment right to freedom of religion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.