1 posted on
05/19/2017 11:17:26 AM PDT by
pabianice
To: pabianice; GraceG
They already did an insane female captain who terrorized her crew and put them in dangerous yet avoidable situations.
That was Voyager.
2 posted on
05/19/2017 11:21:30 AM PDT by
KC_Lion
(Proud Keeper of the Sarah Palin and New First Lady Melania Ping Lists. Let me know if you want on.)
To: pabianice
Not sure what could be more PC than Janeway and her first officer....
To: pabianice
if it is how described it will fail misrably
4 posted on
05/19/2017 11:22:06 AM PDT by
PCPOET7
(in)
To: pabianice
Ten bucks says they try to kill the old “No Muslims in Star Trek” joke this time out. They came close with DS9.
5 posted on
05/19/2017 11:23:27 AM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: pabianice
Roddenberry created "StarTrek" as his view of a utopian future, lest we forget TOS was as "PC" as it could be to get on the air in the 60s.
7 posted on
05/19/2017 11:26:31 AM PDT by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
To: pabianice
The constant thirsting for endless Star Wars, Star Trek, Spiderman, Superman, Batman, etc. product rehashing the same tired story lines over and over again is perplexing to me (looks Harry Potter is following the same trend, as if 8 movies weren’t enough).
I’m 2 seasons into the Breaking Bad prequel and have had enough. I will admit the Bates Motel remake was awesome, 50 years later, although it followed the same basic storyline.
To: pabianice
Star Trek was always pseudo-Communist in its vision of the future. Star Wars and BSG were much more realistic in their take on future society.
9 posted on
05/19/2017 11:30:26 AM PDT by
NRx
(A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
To: Borges; DollyCali; Perdogg
To: pabianice
They should just call it STAR DRECK
13 posted on
05/19/2017 11:35:54 AM PDT by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
To: pabianice
Show was due January 2017. Then summer, 2017. Now -- who knows? The original show runner quit and show has been turned-over to others. Casting reportedly still incomplete.Like other Trek fans I am still unsure why "Enterprise" was hurriedly canceled after four seasons.I'm not unsure at all!
I looked forward to it after it was announced and within the first few episodes the PC imbecile "Captain" was forced to deliver, by the queer PC writers, a diatribe about how "Space Pirates" should not be hunted down and killed mercilessly like rabid dogs because they might be 'misunderstood,' or be deprived by societies in the universe of a means to earn a living through honest work...
I switched channels and never went back ---apparently 4 years ahead of the curve!
16 posted on
05/19/2017 11:38:52 AM PDT by
publius911
(I SUPPORT MY PRESIDENT?)
To: pabianice
The idea that this will be a show for all nationalities and sexual choices seems doomed to me.
For the original series, the muckety-mucks said that either the chick (Number One) or the Martian (Spock) had to go. They were right.
20 posted on
05/19/2017 11:44:17 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: pabianice
...I am still unsure why "Enterprise" was hurriedly canceled after four seasons... All shows with Scott Bakula are doomed to premature cancellation. If Max and Leo had cast Bakula as Hitler, they'd have retired rich.
26 posted on
05/19/2017 11:53:38 AM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: pabianice
On Star Trek: Enterprise they kept taking their clothes off and it was off putting. They had near everyone either naked or striped down to their underwear during the series. They had one guy (Tripp) running around in his underwear for most of one episode.
Oh and shoot first or the series will be over real quick.
Also the new Klingons should be named Clingons as they do not look like Klingons but maybe their distant 2nd or 3rd cousins.
To: pabianice
“Star Trek: Discovery trailer (looks like PC run amok)”
There was maybe one white guy in the whole darn trailer.
36 posted on
05/19/2017 12:19:34 PM PDT by
Brooklyn Attitude
(The first step in ending the War on White People, is to recognize it exists.)
To: pabianice
Voyager went all in on the PC stuff. Woman captain, space american indian first officer, black vulcan, asian navigator, hispanic female klingon, and just one white guy who was, of course, a bad seed.
Yup, they went all in. But they forgot the gay character so they got no credit. This time they won't make that mistake. Lots of gay moments, you can count on it.
To: pabianice
I gave Trek allowances until the JJ Abrams reboot. That did it for me and I no longer care what they come up with anymore.
50 posted on
05/19/2017 3:09:20 PM PDT by
xp38
To: pabianice
White males (whites in general) regulated to the back of the bus and lesser roles.
Swing and a miss. Next.
53 posted on
05/20/2017 3:08:43 AM PDT by
Boomer
(Stupid is as stupid does and no one does stupid like the left.)
To: pabianice
No doubt they’ll throw in one “historical” reference to the failed presidency of President Trump for good measure.
54 posted on
05/20/2017 5:31:20 AM PDT by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Prayers for our country and President Trump)
To: pabianice
Bookmarking to view trailer later. Wondering how overtly homosexual the crew member could be?
55 posted on
05/22/2017 7:38:45 PM PDT by
NetAddicted
(Just looking)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson