Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen
That's all irrelevant.

No living organism directly utilizes fire as a primary biological energy source.

Mankind uses fire as a tool.

The clickbait framing presented fire as a biological development.

16 posted on 05/21/2017 5:21:42 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

Re: No living organism directly utilizes fire as a primary biological energy source.

Yes, you make a good point.

On the other hand, I felt the author was saying that land animals could not have evolved into their current size without the after effects of fire.


23 posted on 05/21/2017 10:55:11 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson