Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker
I am not saying I have the answers but this is gobbledygook. I know BS when I see it.

Assuming that life did not parachute in, fully formed, from elsewhere, a number of authors12,​13,​14,​15 have argued that the transition from non-life to life took place in the context of geochemical energy, with the ability to harness sunlight evolving later (Fig. 1). Consistent with this, both phylogenetic16 and biochemical13,17 evidence suggest that the earliest life forms were chemoautotrophs, perhaps living by reacting hydrogen with carbon dioxide and giving off acetate, methane and water13,16. Mounting evidence18,​19,​20,​21,​22 suggests that the transition from non-life to life may have taken place before 3.7 Ga—a time from which few rocks remain23.

33 posted on 05/22/2017 3:32:08 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: central_va; LibWhacker
central_va quoting article: "Mounting evidence18,​19,​20,​21,​22 suggests that the transition from non-life to life may have taken place before 3.7 Ga—a time from which few rocks remain23."

central_va: "I am not saying I have the answers but this is gobbledygook.
I know BS when I see it."

Not total BS, but admittedly speculation, hypotheses based on very detailed observations and some experiments.
So when might natural organic chemistry have "complexified" into biology -- was it 3.7 billion years ago?
Maybe, but that all depends on your definition of "life".

34 posted on 05/22/2017 12:44:11 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson