Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sargon
It is your hysterical reaction at the beginning of this thread that is ridiculous, and it should be patently obvious that no police officer should wear politically or racially inflammatory T-shirts when on duty, or appearing in court as a police office Hysterical? Your the one that threw the first invective.

Patently obvious? Why, because you say it is patently obvious? Sounds like the Global Warming argument.

What constitutes a "racially inflammatory" tee shirt. Who are the arbiters? You? BLM? A majority vote?

Would Gadsden Flag be Racially inflammatory?

33 posted on 07/29/2017 9:22:56 AM PDT by Flick Lives (#CNNblackmail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Flick Lives
What constitutes a "racially inflammatory" tee shirt. Who are the arbiters?

The arbiters are the officer's superiors in the department, and—in case you haven't noticed—his chief has clearly spoken out as to this officer's violation of policy. The officer was wrong, and I fully agree with his "non-contact" assignment. Period.

37 posted on 07/29/2017 9:29:04 AM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson