Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
Yes it did.

Madison's "salary grab" amendment was introduced in 1789 and finally ratified in 1992 as the 27th Amendment.

The business of placing ratification windows in amendments started with the 18th Amendment and has continued ever since. Madison's 1789 amendment did not have a ratification window specified, therefore it was capable of ratification at any time after Congress passed it by two thirds margins, which was in 1789. It took 203 years to finally be ratified.

Congress objected to the Archivist of the United States' decision to accept the final ratifications, but the Archivist wrote congressional leadership a masterly memo that quoted every Supreme Court decision relating to the amendatory process. Congress could have taken the Archivist to court, but 1992 was an election year with an anti-incumbent bias. Deciding that discretion was the better part of valor, Congress backed down and passed the joint resolution officially welcoming the 27th Amendment into the Constitution.

25 posted on 08/12/2017 10:18:11 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

Wow, it really did. Was not aware of it.

The time limits they have been placing on the amendments is to dela with exactly this situation of having something hang for literally 200+ years. If it takes that long to get an amendment passed it probably is not a good one or by then it’s antiquated/outdated and could actually be considered unconstitutional if scotus rulings have occurred on the subject in the meantime.


34 posted on 08/12/2017 11:49:51 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson