To: BenLurkin
No photos with 200 passengers and probably 200 smart phones.
2 posted on
09/02/2017 12:07:36 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Did voting for Trump for President, make 62+ million of us into Deplorable Racists/Nazis? NO! NADA!)
To: Grampa Dave
Point well taken, though taking a pic of anything flying bow to stern over an airliner in which you are a passenger would be difficult, I think.
3 posted on
09/02/2017 12:10:28 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Grampa Dave
Cell phones are notoriously slow in getting ready to take a picture unless you are already in the photo app.
7 posted on
09/02/2017 12:20:57 PM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(CNN IS ISIS.)
To: Grampa Dave
Pretty good thought. I take pics on the plane with my camera and I’m sure someone must’ve had one of these, no?
Or, pics removed....govt conspiracy ;)
19 posted on
09/02/2017 12:43:05 PM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: Grampa Dave
Was 100-200ft above their aircraft. So they would have had to take the pictures through the transparent ceiling?
22 posted on
09/02/2017 12:54:01 PM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: Grampa Dave
No photos with 200 passengers and probably 200 smart phones. So you're saying it didn't happen? Two pilots risked their careers by reporting this, just for the hell of it?
35 posted on
09/02/2017 7:26:37 PM PDT by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson