Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foreign rocket engines for North Korea: Why? (somewhat tinfoil-ish)
The Slovak Spectator ^ | 22. Sep 2017 | Juraj Mesík

Posted on 09/22/2017 8:17:52 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2017 8:17:53 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Fat boy thinks Putin has his back.

What he doesn’t know is Putin has a knife in his hand.................


2 posted on 09/22/2017 8:21:41 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Not sure about EMP angle, but setting E. Asia on fire may have some appealing angle for Russia. In that case, Kim will be in the middle of fireball.
3 posted on 09/22/2017 8:26:24 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

>The explosion of a strong nuclear head on a ballistic missile “tested” several hundred kilometers above the territory of North Korea could generate an electromagnetic pulse capable of knocking out electric infrastructure and electronic devices for millions of square miles below the epicenter.

Is this actually true? It sounds rather unbelievable.


4 posted on 09/22/2017 8:28:49 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It will be interesting to see if the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, et al, suddenly pull their diplomats out of NK.....................


5 posted on 09/22/2017 8:30:14 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Graft from Russian billionaires? No way!

6 posted on 09/22/2017 8:30:20 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krosan

It would be a windfall for Apple and Samsung.........Everybody’s smartphones would be dead..................


7 posted on 09/22/2017 8:31:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

it cannot be excluded that at least some, if not all, rocket components are being delivered by state actors.

Did Hillary and Obama give them the OK to do this when she SOLD them the Uranium, was this part of their secret deal?

Shouldn’t they be asked these questions.


8 posted on 09/22/2017 8:32:05 AM PDT by eyeamok (Idle hands are the Devil's workshop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why doesn’t Kim Ding Dong threaten to pop a nuke over South Korea?

I thought defeating South Korea was his goal?

He acts like he’s a puppet.


9 posted on 09/22/2017 8:34:05 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
In Vietnam, Samsung has a major production line for smartphones. So they can churn out replacements from there. The last I heard, Apple's iPhone production lines are in China. If it is in Southern China, it would be OK, I guess. Otherwise, its production line will be fried, too.
10 posted on 09/22/2017 8:35:31 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But Samsung’s factory would be dead too.


11 posted on 09/22/2017 8:40:12 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I’m not buying this theory.
First off, let’s acknowledge that suggesting Russia wants N.Korea to blow up to hurt China is definitely in the category of conspiracy theory. But to entertain the conspiracy theory for a moment, you have to believe that a Nuke going off over N.Korea will perminantly weaken China. Even if the EMP aspect is technically correct (which is also an assumption) I just don’t see how it has a major permanent effect on China’s power.


12 posted on 09/22/2017 8:48:41 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This recalls the civil war in Spain during the 1930’s.

Germany and Italy were fighting a proxy war with the Soviet Union on somebody else’s real estate, the “Republicans” (backed by the Soviet Union) against the Spanish Falange (supported by the Italian Fascists and the German Nazis).

Everybody involved had to be some kind of socialist, but it was an excellent test bed for trying out various military hardware and tactics. The Spanish Falange (under Franco) sat out the Second World War, but was still a conduit for assistance to the Axis powers.

North Korea is a place to try out a test bed of various Russian Federation designs. Russia and China do not always have the easiest of relationships, and this is as much between Russia and China as it is between the US and North Korea.

There is a secret struggle going on we are not seeing.

Yet.


13 posted on 09/22/2017 8:54:41 AM PDT by alloysteel (Guilty until proven innocent, while denying defense, justice, mercy or any appeal. No pardon, ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The Spanish Falange (under Franco) sat out the Second World War, but was still a conduit for assistance to the Axis powers.

Sat out-ish. Spain sent the 'Blue' Division to Russia after Barbarossa and withdrew it when it looked like Germany would lose.

They also made good money selling tungsten to the Axis which was needed for armor and hardening AP shells.

14 posted on 09/22/2017 8:58:49 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: z3n
China has not always been a monolithic entity. A weakened central authority and emergence of autonomous regional powers could weaken Chinese state. This situation may not end soon once it starts. The last time Russia marched into China and grabbed its land was during one of such periods.
15 posted on 09/22/2017 9:00:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Krosan

Would anybody notice?....................


16 posted on 09/22/2017 9:02:21 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
As for Hillary and/or Obama selling engines, how many of the engines we bought from Russia during the Obama years can be absolutely proven to have been used in a successful launch?

I'm not sure anyone can even find out how many engines we actually buy from Russia unless they go to the Russian source and people in the US have been batter dipped in lies about Russia so who would believe what the manufacturer said?

Maybe the same Pentagon that can't account for several Trillion dollars can tell us how many we purchased and how many we've used, right?

As far as I'm concerned, the fact that we know Ukraine is desperate for cash therefore it's inexpensive to pay them to look the other way, the factory (owned and controlled by a criminal oligarch) that makes the engines in question is sitting idle with a stash of engines on hand, and Ukraine was trying to sell engines even before the coup took place, points the the talk about Russia or China being involved as nothing by smoke. The mirrors to go with that smoke are in Pakistan where they make an engine almost identical to the one in question for their own IRBMs.

Don't want to upset the Afghanistan opium business with any fuss over the Paks selling engines or the looting of Ukraine with fuss over Ukraine selling them. That's the bottom line which means the most likely suspects aren't the most popular suspects.

JMHo

17 posted on 09/22/2017 9:20:06 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Your post is pretty thick with the well known false conspiracy theories.


18 posted on 09/22/2017 9:26:42 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Krosan

My opinionated, “in general” comment:

The term “conspiracy theory” is often used to validate false explanations by discrediting true explanations.


19 posted on 09/22/2017 9:29:39 AM PDT by Kalamata (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kalamata
I don't disagree. That is why I added the word 'false'. If you can give me a better word for the false claims like "Pentagon lost $10 trillions" I'd be grateful. Malicious rumors?
20 posted on 09/22/2017 9:41:12 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson