To: Morgana
Supreme Court already decided this and the law is on the kids side under religious freedom clause. Goes back to Jehovah Witnesses around WW2. Supreme Court also ruled in the 60s that HS kids can wear black armbands in protest. While we may not like it, the free speech laws have been adjudicated in this regard. Students do have the right to free speech when they enter the school grounds. If speech is removed for one class of citizens, then what other class should have their speech curtailed?
11 posted on
10/08/2017 3:27:20 PM PDT by
abigkahuna
(How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
To: abigkahuna
If speech is removed for one class of citizens, then what other class should have their speech curtailed?muslims.
16 posted on
10/08/2017 3:52:18 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: abigkahuna
Precisely
During the Vietnam Nam war there were kids in my high school who refused to stand for the pledge. We talked about it then ignored them
Free speech means all sorts of things can be said. Doesn’t mean you have to agree or listen
20 posted on
10/08/2017 4:20:31 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: abigkahuna
Summer of `42.
India doesn't have to like it but she can stand like everyone else or stay home, which is probably what she wants. Time for a test case. Bring it on libs. (And bring back corporal punishment.)
The Bellamy salute. His brother Edward (?) wrote `Looking Backward' a socialist wet dream.
27 posted on
10/08/2017 6:44:08 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson