Is it curious that Time’s lawyers would let them brand him a “predator” when he has not been convicted of anything?
They appear not to be concerned about a libel suit.
Do they know that Weinstein wouldn’t or couldn’t sue, for some reason?
Yep I was noting that too.
Usually the media are careful about saying things are “alleged” or “charges were made” about some subject, without stating as a fact, pending legal actions or legal settlements.
The last thing that Weinstein wants is evidentiary discovery. Who knows what's waiting to be found?