Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RooRoobird20

“I’m sure the Dallas police knew and didn’t care if he [Ruby] carried his gun into the precinct office.” <—That’s absurd, given the alarming stress and tension of the day.

Jack Ruby:
Jack shouldn’t have been needed since Oswald should have been already executed. He was likely meant to be killed at the theater or some point earlier in the hour following his departure from the TSBD.

When the plan failed, the organizers got in contact with their former partners in the Op-Mongoose plots and set in motion a clean-up guy. The urgency escalated when Oswald attempted the call to John Hurt (CIA -Raleigh NC.) Since Jack Ruby had been stalking around the DPD for two days, even posing as a reporter at a press conference (unchallenged) he became the man of the hour.

Ruby accessed the prime suspect to the president’s murder with cooperation from the DPD. The ease by which Ruby gained entry into the DPD basement to kill Oswald was quite the camouflage job sold to the Warren Commission. The HSCA report on the DPD handling will clearlt contradicts the WCR.

Burt Griffin indicated it was BS and suspected that DPD Pat Dean, chief of security, was deceitful in his testimony regarding Ruby’s accessibility. Griffin sent a memo to Warren questioning Dean’s BS story. The Dallas Police responded along with the DA’s office and pressured Warren who eventually backed down and abandoned Griffin. Griffin’s suspicions were later validated.

The HSCA found out Dean lied about Ruby’s entry into the basement. Vaughn, the WC witness, pinned Ruby’s opportune entry entirely on the DPD and passed his polygraph test affirming these facts. OTH, Dean failed his own polygraph test whereby as chief of security, he had posed his own line of questioning, lol.

The DPD kept a key witness, Sgt. Flusche, away from the WC and Burt Griffin. Flusche had stood directly across the street from the ramp and Vaughn. Flusche knew Jack Ruby and told the HSCA it was impossible for Jack Ruby to have been in the proximity of the ramp prior to Oswald being escorted out by DPD.

During the actual film of Oswald being killed, there’s an odd occurrence within the movement of the DPD. Just as LHO steps from the elevator and they march him out of the foyer, Fritz breaks the pre-designed protective pocket that had encircled Oswald. Fritz briskly strides 10’- 14’ ahead, providing ample space for Ruby to frontally attack-shoot Oswald. Not that it was necessarily premeditated, but it happened and Fritz’s reaction to the shots fired were delayed in comparison to the other officers surrounding LHO.

Without this opportune failure of security, it would have been impossible for Jack Ruby to have killed Oswald that day. There is no doubt that Ruby had been allowed to stalk around DPD looking for Oswald for two days. He can be seen lurking behind other DPD officers.

But alas, we are to believe it’s just one lucky lone nut executing another lone nut.


55 posted on 10/27/2017 10:11:02 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies (Do lone wolfs eat lone nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

What are your ORIGINAL verified sources for what you are alleging? Where are the reputable bibiliographies?


56 posted on 10/27/2017 11:11:50 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves."a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Let me give you an example of a typical BS JFK Conspiracy Book: 1992’s “Conspiracy of Silence” (later renamed “Trauma Room One”) By Dr. Charles Crenshaw. It was a major sensation at the time because he claimed he treated JFK in Trauma Room One in Parklane Hospital, so whatever he had to say had to be true, right?

Except that many of his very significant claims were lies, and were proven to be lies. He changed his own stories/testimony when others started to investigate the claims in his book and started challenging them. His book had no credible bibliography to speak of. I bought the book and read it, it was a great camp fire ghost story.

Dr. Crenshaw was an opportunistic conspiracy promoter, and he lied/stretched the truth in order to sell books. He backed away from many of the things he had said in the book when others started researching, and were able to prove that many of his claims were impossible. Other doctors and staff in the hospital consistently contradicted what he claimed regarding where he was, who he was with, and at what time in the hospital the day of the assassination. His book was a NYT best seller at the time, but it has largely been discredited since then.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/crenshaw.htm

Here is a web page with source links showing how the “Consiracy of Silence” book is largely a bunch of baloney written by a dishonest opportunist trying to enrich himself off the JFK assassination.


57 posted on 10/27/2017 11:58:35 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves."a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson